Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMX Resources


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter  (gas)  @ 22:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

IMX Resources

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Please comment on the significance of the article ..... Alferdomach (talk) 06:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep I believe that the fact that a publicly traded company is listed on a major developed country's (Australia's) public stock exchange is a strong claim of notability. Also the company has regional significance as the first company to open a new iron ore mine in South Australia in over a century, and the first in Australia to utilise the rotainer system for iron ore exports. Danimations (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The nominator has not provided a valid deletion rationale. The article in The Australian indicates notability, probably more available if some legwork was done. --kelapstick(bainuu) 00:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.