Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INHERITORS (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:15, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

INHERITORS (game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested PROD. No assertion of notability through reliable, published sources. Does not meet general notability guidelines. --Teancum (talk) 19:05, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Blatant advertisement for a non-notable product that doesn't even exist yet, created by somebody who has made no other contributions to Wikipedia and who deleted both the tag and the WP:PROD without comment. Dricherby (talk) 21:30, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Advert, clear original research, Conflict of Interest, fails WP:GNG, no sources, fails WP:CRYSTAL ... and egad THE SHOUTING. I'd also say this meets CSD G11! - Rushyo  Talk  21:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: No indication of importance. SL93 (talk) 22:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as blatant advertising. Subject also makes no credible claim to importance. Both A7 and G11 can apply to this article. → B  music  ian  01:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Query: Since A7 includes web content but explicitly excludes software, would A7 actually apply? - Rushyo  Talk  08:32, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * This is an internet game, not software. SL93 (talk) 08:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * What's the distinction? The article says that Flash player is needed, so the user plays the game by the browser downloading software (the Flash code) and executing it. Dricherby (talk) 08:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Internet videos require the same thing, but they aren't software either. SL93 (talk) 13:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * In the case of videos, I would argue that you're downloading a small piece of software and a big chunk of data to be played by that software. The software there is just a means to an end.  But, in the case of a game, I don't see any difference between downloading a standalone application and running it outside the browser, versus downloading a Flash application and running it in the browser. But, in any case, only one reason is needed for a speedy delete and G11 seems to fit. Dricherby (talk) 14:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - this could have A7ed and if not A7, G11 was also eligible. It is unsourced, promotional and not-notable  →TSU tp* 04:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable, no sources, is an advert. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.