Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INTTRA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neil N  talk to me 04:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

INTTRA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable e-commerce site. Almost all sources are reprinted press releases (run the text through Google) or dead. Looks to be part of a long-term paid-editing campaign, and creator has so far refused to answer questions on whether they have a COI. Calton | Talk 00:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowling Green massacre — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noob e (talk • contribs) 00:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Patent nonsense !vote is patent nonsense. Struck. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable, and paid editing to boot. Ugh. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.