Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INVO Bioscience


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 12:54, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

INVO Bioscience

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly promotional orphaned article that reads like a sales pamphlet. Continual discussion of "lower price", "more effective" (without proof). Unsourced, and does not meet WP:CORP (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sources do not demonstrate notability.--Hu12 (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article as written skirts the line of irredeemable advertising. The sourcing in the article fails to demonstrate notability.  My own searches turn up a flood of press releases and some minor mentions.  the best of the lot is this item.  i just don't see the coverage needed. -- Whpq (talk) 17:25, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.