Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INgage Networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

INgage Networks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches found nothing particularly good to suggest improvement and better notability, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Essentially, the press releases and such seem to noticeably outweigh the good coverage. If you wish, I suggest looking through the history and seeing how the article has changed over the years but there has never actually been much good coverage. SwisterTwister  talk  06:00, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete The sources are all junk and/or broken links, server errors, awards, or articles that do not mention the article-subject. CorporateM (Talk) 02:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No coverage that establishes notability. Mostly press releases available. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  22:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.