Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPI Solutions Nigeria Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

IPI Solutions Nigeria Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

insignificant awards. Routine company with no special notability  DGG ( talk ) 22:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. I agree with DGG that the awards are not sufficient for establishing notability. -- HighKing ++ 15:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Delete. Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG - M assiveYR  ♠  14:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete aside the non-notable awards, I noticed that the cited notable sources are PR-like. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:26, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Apart from the non notable awards. I think the article meets GNG. Sources such as Nigeria Today, Daily Trust Nigeria prove notability.--KaytroniX (talk) 22:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Sources need not only to be reliable but independent, the two cited articles mentioned above are an interview with the corporation's CEO and a news release from the company.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete fails WP:CORP for lack of in depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant independent coverage in reliable sources. See reply to comment above. --Bejnar (talk) 21:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- just a promo blurb for an unremarkable private company. WP:CORPDEPTH not met. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:57, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  08:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - wholly promotional. . . Mean as custard (talk) 16:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- the awards do not prove notability as they are relatively insignificant jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as above, appears promotional. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.