Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPSP PHP (SDK)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

IPSP PHP (SDK)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most of the sources given are to the website of the software in question, and the rest are to sites that don't pass Identifying reliable sources. This is not enough to show that the topic meets the general notability guideline, and I couldn't find any other sources online. (Contested PROD.) — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 23:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:28, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:28, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:28, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- WP:MANUAL for an unremarkable software. Not suitable for inclusion at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:04, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you mean WP:NOTMANUAL - WP:MANUAL redirects to Wikipedia's manual of style. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 07:59, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as above, and this is not an acronym encyclopedia. W Nowicki (talk) 22:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.