Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IP (Integrated Project)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   a unanimous delete on the basis that the subject does not meet guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

IP (Integrated Project)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable high-school project. High number of reverts from. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It is a shame that no CSD category can be applied to hopeless cases like this. Cunard (talk) 15:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. It's on the border of WP:MADEUP. tedder (talk) 00:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ohms law (talk) 03:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There is nothing to merge and no verifiable notability. Pastor Theo (talk) 05:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as what's discussed here is thoroughly nn; the idea of an integrated project is probably notable in the sense of Dissertation and perhaps Integrated project should be a dab, but this page as titled should be deleted. JJL (talk) 13:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.