Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IParkIt!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The sources are indeed all from the same press release, which has me give more weight to the delete side, which has backed their position up more solidly. NW ( Talk ) 20:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

IParkIt!

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No references to verify popularity claims, or establish notability. Google search does not show any coverage in reliable sources, nor verify claims Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete –As spam claims in article cannot be verified or support. In fact the one notability claim “..#1 on UK Apple store is false in that the Apple Stores do not even show carrying this item, as shown here .  Struck comments based on Dori findings  Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 13:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:47, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - I did a little bit of research, and somehow, unlike Omarcheeseboro or ShoesssS, I was able to find coverage of the game in WP:RS, and find it in the iTunes store (tip: Apple.com ≠ iTunes.app). OTOH, that led to me tossing almost everything that was in the article, as none of that was verifiable—so, all we're left with is that the app exists, but is not (yet) terribly notable. My keep is because I think it meets WP:GNG, but I'm not even sure about that. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 02:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Being a popular iPhone app is not notability.
 * Delete - All four citations are actually the same single source - the Nickelodeon press release made at the end of August. This does not count towards the significant, independent coverage suggested by the notability guidelines. Marasmusine (talk) 14:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.