Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPayables


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

IPayables

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page created by a COI editor. It's been CSD'd already (iirc). Article is extremely adverty and spammy. The almighty Google God shows nothing in regards to news articles and really nothing in regards to the company being notable.  D u s t i *poke* 05:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment This page has been deleted four times already. It may be appropriate, should consensus be to delete, to salt the page.  D u s t i *poke* 05:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and Salt. Fails WP:CORP; Google News Archive finds mainly press releases. --MelanieN (talk) 03:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete = I did a couple of different searches, and found nothing but Wikis, Facebook, general coporate listings, and press releases, none of which even verifies the company's existence. I could not find it at the California SOS website.  In fact, from what I could find, it has a handful of clients (at least four, but can't be much more, if they issued a press release in February 2013 announcing "two more clients").  I found a listing at Business Week that the firm was founded in 1999, but I can't see anything more than trivial coverage.  This a small, non-public, run of the mill billing firm, thus failing WP:CORP and WP:GNG. We are not a webhost for companies. Bearian (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.