Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPercept Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

IPercept Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article is written like an advert, which of course is a reason to improve not delete it, but I am unable to find suitable sources. The sources currently used in the article are listicles and lightly rehashed press releases; I can't find anything giving the depth of coverage required by WP:CORPDEPTH, and believe the subject (a Swedish start-up tech company) fails WP:NCORP. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Sweden.  Girth Summit  (blether)  13:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I took a look in Mediearkivet, which collects a lot of Swedish newspaper articles from the last couple of decades, and IPercept Technology seems to be treated as an interesting, up and coming company showing promise, something beyond your average run-of-the-mill startup – included in lists of hot companies to keep an eye on – but I couldn't find any proper sources to actually build an article from. /Julle (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: the material I've found that attempts to provide extended coverage of the company are pressreleases/adverts. Judging by NCORP/CORPDEPTH there is no notability at this time. Also, per WP:TOOSOON. Draken Bowser (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Since no one has been able to identify the necessary sources. Would have liked to keep this article, but I have not been able to find anything myself. /Julle (talk) 18:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.