Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPhone 12 mini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Withdraw by nominator, transfer discussion to merger proposal. (non-admin closure) ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  19:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

IPhone 12 mini

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Following the format of articles on variants of previous iPhone models, this article should be merged into iPhone 12. It's essentially the same exact phone, but smaller. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯  talk  18:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  18:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support - I support merging the articles. It contains practically the same hardware and has the same features, but at a different size. This follows the precedent set on the iPhone 6, 6s, 7, and 8, off the top of my head. It's not different enough to have its own article, in my opinion. Herbfur (talk) 18:56, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per the format with the Pro's/Pro Max'es. I think the page is actually young enough you can get away with redirecting everything to iPhone 12 without anyone noticing. Admanny (talk) 18:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support for consistency. --17jiangz1 (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support given that this article departs from the commonly accepted practice of including variations of a particular generation of smartphone in a single article on that generation of smartphone. Jhw57 (talk) 19:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. If the nominator thinks that the article should be merged, not deleted, the nominator should go through the process of article merger, not article deletion. --Neo-Jay (talk) 19:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree. This would be best handled as an article merger, not a deletion. Herbfur (talk) 19:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: Nominator has begun merge proceedings instead. Time to close this discussion? Herbfur (talk) 19:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.