Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPlum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

IPlum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. No claim of notability, 2 app reviews and mentioned in only one article -Liancetalk/contribs 02:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG --allthefoxes (Talk) 04:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references apart from tech.co, a source which does not appear to meet WP:RS standards as it has no clear editorial policy and accepts paid/sponsored posts. App store inclusion does not confer notability. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 00:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as newly founded with unlikely enough solid in-depth third-party coverage sources for a better article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  07:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.