Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPod Index


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

IPod Index

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable PR puffery translated into an article. Do we now reward adept PR people with articles? This is a non notable, here today gone tomorrow initiative, most recently of an Australian bank, previously possibly of some other bank. It has little or no merit, and is only notable in terms of lazy media swallowing in full the "interesting" press release to get a few easy column inches. What next on wikipedia? Rollerskating ducks?. A Press Release to Article API?


 * Delete --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete-- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 16:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Absolute crap. --- RockMFR 18:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. --BenWhitey 19:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - currently fails WP:V; needs sources to prove that this index is in wide use. If no sources are provided, delete. Walton monarchist89 19:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge parts of it into the Big Mac index TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 21:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NEO. (There is no need to rant and rail in nominations, it often works against you.) --Dhartung | Talk 22:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete insufficient sources to pass WP:NEO.-- danntm T C 23:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.