Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPod Nano Touch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. ÷seresin 23:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

IPod Nano Touch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete - Completely unsourced speculation. WP:CRYSTAL. Prodded, prod-2'd, and then deprodded by creator without explanation. Googling turns up a couple unreliable YouTube videos, and not much else. Certainly, there's no indication the nex-gen Nano/Touch hybrid is going to be called by this name. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I almost had coca-cola come out of my nose when I read Cybercobra's request. This article must be deleted because this device does not exist. It isn't in the planning. It is based on a few photos people have uploaded to the Internet, developed by amateurs. I say they're amateurs because the artist couldn't even spell the word "coming" correctly in the image. One of the images even had the SMS and Phone icons - neither of them even appearing in the iPod touch. I can't believe this article was created based on these false rumors. And the information about pricing and such - where are they coming up with this stuff? Seriously, think about it as if you were working for Apple: would Apple even make something like this, and compete directly with the iPod touch in both price and capacity? If this article lives on, I'm going to create a page for the Apple Macintosh Post-It Notes Saturday Night Live advertised a dozen years ago. Like Cybercobra wrote, WP:CRYSTAL with Pixy attached to it. Groink (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone's wishlist item. See here. Bongo  matic  08:04, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Really?  JBsupreme (talk) 08:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons given by Groink. Pokerdance (talk/contribs) 10:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Groink. This is ridiculous. How someone could have deprodded in good faith is beyond me.Tim Song (talk) 13:00, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  --  treelo  radda  18:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and other given reasons above. --Taylor Karras (talk) 18:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. SNOW, anyone? Drmies (talk) 21:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.