Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPod shuffle Database Builder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mr.Z-man 00:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

IPod shuffle Database Builder

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't see any claim to notability in the article. There are no external sources for this article other than the sourceforge page to download it. A quick Google search doesn't reveal any news about it. Miami33139 (talk) 23:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: unsourced article about non-notable program. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: looks like an attempt to promote a not-yet-notable application. maxsch (talk) 01:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a comment for now: A search shows that the author had an article in PC Magazine and the program was independently covered in the book "Apple Hacks."  It is included in some Linux distributions.  I think that it could easily meet WP:N.  I suspect that there are probably other sources which would satisfy WP:RS (it had received a lot more non-RS coverage (gizmodo/lifehacker/etc.) than other software & this often trickles into print media).  Since I don't have better examples at the moment, I won't argue that we should keep it.  But it is worth pointing out that the problem with the article isn't really that the subject lacks notability.  --Karnesky (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.