Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPodomination

IPodomination was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.

Neologism, only one Google hit. Noel (talk) 12:02, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) [Entries from WP:RfD] [End of moved entries]
 * Only one google hit for term.I deleted the term from the iPod article. Thue | talk 09:17, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash; David Remahl 16:24, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Unneeded, POV neologism. The page is more a rant than a dictdef.  I thought it was IPO-domination, at first. Geogre 14:50, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: POV advocacy article on a nonexisting term (Google returned 1 result in a Mac forum). --Bbugg 17:45, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Are apple and ipod fans really this lame? Terrapin 19:17, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * What? Paul Tracy
 * Delete Speculative, subjective and worthless Paul Tracy 21:42, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. Personal essay. Not in real use. And ye have seen their ipodominations, and their ipods, silver and gold, which were among them... And these are they which ye shall have in ipodomination among the articles; they shall not be kept, they are an ipodomination: the neologism, the original research, and the personal essay. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 23:46, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * A sure sign of Delete to come. GRider 22:00, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.