Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IRMOS Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

IRMOS Project

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

This is yet another article on an FP7 project, part of a ongoing effort to get articles on Framework Programme projects onto Wikipedia. This article was created by User:Irmos-FP7. As I stated in my prod tag, this IRMOS Project, "Interactive Realtime Multimedia Applications on Service Oriented Infrastructures" is not notable by Wikipedia's usual standards, with no independent third party sources. The Google hits one finds for IRMOS are for Infrared Multi-Object spectrometer instead. Abductive (reasoning) 12:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Mm40 (talk) 12:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- John Vandenberg (chat) 14:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  -- John Vandenberg (chat) 14:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. In addition to notability concerns, this is an example of prose that, while superficially grammatical, is so confused that nobody could reasonably be expected to make sense of it. An integrated optimisation approach at various levels from inter-organisation business processes and SLAs to intelligent networking and virtualisation techniques that enable real-time interaction and concurrency at all points of value chains. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. What an unencyclopedic article.  Agree with the above, also add that this seems to consist largely of hopeful expectations for the future (see "Expected Impact" section).  Little value in retaining this.  --Glenfarclas (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete only exceptionally will this kind of projects be notable, and this one is no exception... --Crusio (talk) 17:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.