Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IR Gurus (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   19:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

IR Gurus
Previously deleted as spam at Articles for deletion/IR Gurus, this version is not spam but neither does it make any substantive claim in excess of those made by the previous deleted version. Not a repost (different content, different editor). I'm inclined to advocate keep due to the company's products having been distributed by Sony, but since it's in a single market (not much call for Aussie rules football in America, I guess) this is debatable. Either way if it stays here it is likely to be tagged repost without an unequivocal vote one way or the other. Just zis Guy you know? 09:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, any company that can get a PS2 game published in this day and age is notable enough for me. They have the license of a major sporting league too, so it doesn't seem that fly-by-night IMO. Recury 18:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP. BlueValour 21:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Ezeu 18:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per Recury. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 18:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a notable enough company in my opinion --BennyD 00:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep exclusive rights to the AFL seems notable in Australia, I guess? Any Aussies here?--Nick Y. 01:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I got 29 results for this company on an Australian/New Zealand media search so they meet WP:CORP. Capitalistroadster 02:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 02:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- meets my notability meter. - Longhair 03:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Recury -- Synapse 15:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.