Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISOP

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Nufy8 20:42, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

ISOP
Delete, non-notable orientation program for a subset of new students to a single campus of a single university. Sole inbound link is to an unrelated topic. - choster 13:32, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per referer DV8 2XL 14:15, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete, an encyclopedia is suppose to contain various knowledge about everything, not only mainstream, well noted information. - Unsigned post from 160.94.154.119 10:24, 31 August 2005
 * Delete Mate, I'm afraid that that you possess a fundamentally incorrect understanding of what an encyclopedia is. An encyclopedia, in this case Wikipedia, contains only verifiable, documented, NPOV, notable, information. We aren't interested in police blotters or orientation information. Please see WP:NOT, WP:V, and Wikipedia for more information. --Blackcap | talk 21:42, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No it isn't. Tonywalton | Talk 18:30, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Dottore So 23:31, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is more notable than Islam? By your standards most everything should go.  If you don't want to be associated with whomever uses your IP create an account. gren グレン 14:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Who are you talking to? --Blackcap | talk 17:12, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete, Wiki is suppose to contain a plethora of knowledge, not only mainstream. Black cap, perhaps you should re-read WP:NOT yourself, and i quote "Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. This means that there is no practical limit to number of topics we can cover..."  Match, Set, Point - unsigned post by Gephart. This is this user's second edit. --Blackcap
 * Sign your posts, and don't change the votes of others. It is vandalism and will not be tolerated. If I was an admin I would block you for doing that, so you'd better be gald glad I'm not. It's true, WP is not a paper encyclopedia, but see my post above, and WP is not an indiscriminate collector of information. --Blackcap | talk 17:19, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. --Metropolitan90 07:43, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom. Alf melmac 11:29, 4 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.