Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISPA Belgium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NorthAmerica1000 12:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

ISPA Belgium

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All sources are not independent. Reads like an advert. Fails WP:WEB WP:NORG. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment - Nothing to with WP:WEB. The ISPA is an organisation, not a website and therefore we'd use WP:ORG. It is the peak Belgian association of internet providers, but indepth references appear a bit hard to find for two reasons 1. Belgium doesn't speek English and I have no clue of this organisations name in Flemish, French or German and 2) The UK's peak ISP organisation has the same acronym in English. Did find this in a book; 1, mentions here and here.  JT dale Talk ~ 05:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable Organization that meet WP:ORG. There are plenty of reliable sources with a quick google search. In addition to the sources cited by above, I found | this one,, . There are more sources but not in English language. Meanwhile, the fact that sources are not in English is not a suggestion that the subject is not notable. Wikicology (talk) 18:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹   00:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 08:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.