Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IStillPsycho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 03:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

IStillPsycho

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:CRYSTAL, and no references for verification. Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 12:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, as I can only find a single twitter feed and a couple of bloggish references, with no significant coverage or reliable sources mentioning it. Clearly is crystalballing, and original research.  Dennis Brown (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think we get as far as the crystal ball - a sequel to a seemingly insufficiently notable original isn't likely to make the grade now or ever. --Legis (talk - contribs) 09:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.