Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISuppli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Deleted G12 as a copyvio of company webpage and venturebeatprofiles.com/company/profile/isuppli. Black Kite (t) (c) 15:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

ISuppli

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No apparent notability; article is nothing but an advertisement in violation of SOAP. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 16:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Company has been used as a source in the WSJ, Infoworld, BusinessWeek. ffm is now L Faraone  20:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure this usage imbues the company with notability as defined by WP:CORP. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 22:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete it like the nominator says. 207.81.170.99 (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.