Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITN Solicitors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 19:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

ITN Solicitors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage. Looks to fail WP:ORG. Edwardx (talk) 14:59, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  15:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  15:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. Sources on article are trivial mentions. — The   Magnificentist  12:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This firm fails my standards. I represented unpopular clients as a lawyer; that is what you are supposed to do as a lawyer. Bearian (talk) 14:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.