Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITV Encore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. This AfD has been languishing unclosed because it was never listed in the daily log. The strictly proper thing to do now would be to list it and give it the statutory seven days; but since the article has been expanded, and the channel has been confirmed to be opening on 9 June, I am closing as keep per WP:IAR. JohnCD (talk) 13:32, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log

Barely notable, only one source, no programming, vague stub. Perhaps a redirect to ITV (TV channel) would be much better than allowing its own article. TDFan2006 (talk) 10:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: The channel has only just been announced, so it's bound to be vague, the article will most likely grow when more info is announced. Also yes it has one source in the article, but there are others online nothing a quick Google search can't remedy. --  axg //  ✉  ]] ''' 14:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: I think this article will grow, and more sources have been announced.--88.111.113.218 (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: The one source happens to be first party. As far as I can see, that's the only reason this article was marked for deletion. Any third party sources would just be quoting the first party one. But if this article is deleted, it'll only have to be recreated later. Also, if ITV Encore has to be deleted, we can't justify keeping ITVBe either. Personally, I'd just have the pages semi-protected until more information is released. Digifiend (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And that is why I suggested a redirect. TDFan2006 (talk) 21:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: per other users. --SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 12:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: more reliable source have been added and it only going to be recreated, when it launched. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 19:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I came to this article looking for information relating to the channel only to find someone trying to delete the article and deny me the ability to read this article. Ulcerspar12 (talk) 11:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.