Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITV television presentation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Sandstein  06:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

ITV television presentation

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has previously been nominated for deletion, originally when it was named ITV Idents and Presentation. Since then, myself and a number of editors have worked to improve the article. However, I don't feel now that it could be fixed to a sufficient standard. I have my doubts about BBC One 'Circle' idents and BBC One 'Rhythm & Movement' idents too, though I think they are in better shape. Personally, I think the content within this article would be better merged into the respective channel articles. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 03:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  treelo  radda  00:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge where possible - it should be easy to move sourced prose to the relevant ITV1, ITV2, ITV3 or ITV4 articles. Most of the information about the specifics of each ident as well as images (keeping in mind the concerns with fair use) is largely redundant here because they are best dealt with by specialist sites which deal with television presentation. --tgheretford (talk) 00:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 18:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I can't imagine anyone finding this information interesting. But if someone wants to read about this they're welcome to it.  Seems fairly enyclopedic. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Sandstein   19:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep encyclopedic information, probably would be too long in the separate ITV articles, but probably needs to be rewritten (chronologically, instead of separate sections for ITV1,2,3,4) with more references. — Snigbrook 21:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It goes into too much detail to be suitable for a merge to the main ITV article, but could be a sub-article in the same way that History of ITV is. — Snigbrook 21:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep A central place like this is best. Not everything has to be interesting in the usual sense--this is reference information. DGG (talk) 05:13, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.