Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IT New York


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

IT New York

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable PR company, with the only sources being press releases  DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:CORPDEPTH and lack of independent sources. Blue   Riband►   04:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: No substantial sources presented or found that are not linked with the subject; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 09:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 09:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 09:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Puff, puff, puff. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete Sources here and there go nowhere within the passing limits of WP:CORPDEPTH, not sure about any puff pieces on the article though. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 10:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH, provided sources are unsubstantial, trivial press releases, and the article also lacks of independent sources.  Alex discussion ★ 16:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH, provided sources are unsubstantial. An originally commercially written article that doesn't in any way pass WP:NOTAB. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 00:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete no RS, vanity article DocumentError (talk) 07:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * KEEP Revisions have been made to meet the criteriaWP:CORPDEPTH, sources have been listed for IT New York that are unbiased. Articles that prove IT New York is a real company have been listed, they are not press releases and the sources have no affiliation with IT New York. I believe that notoriety has been established from the websites referenced, as well as any other problems with this page being deemed to not meet criteria. talkDanimajor1988 (talk) 05:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC) — Danimajor1988 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.