Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITablet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-10 20:24Z 

ITablet

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Yes there have been rumours that Apple were developing a tablet form computer. However Wikipedia isn't really here to report on rumours. And even if it was, recent events suggest that Apple are not. AlistairMcMillan 00:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete on account of WP:CRYSTAL. --Dennisthe2 00:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is about rumored concept of a non-existent product that has never been announced, and indeed only disavowed by Apple.  If someone wants to write about Apple tablets, write about the ModBook, which at least is announced, demo-ed, and pre-orders being taken.--Jason C.K. 01:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Has rumor all of it and its sources, as per WP:CRYSTAL.--Dacium 01:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Classic example of WP:CRYSTAL. --Shirahadasha 01:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a crystalball--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 03:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per above: WP is not a tool for getting rumors onto the #1 slot on google. Danski14 06:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not properly referenced and quite unreliable, as well as not written in a encyclopedic format. Telly   addict 'Editor review! 16:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Come across alot of info going either way. It's all speculation and no fact. Bring it back only when it's announced, till then, delete. Whilding87  19:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Speculative, and all that pesky crystal ball stuff.  Philippe Beaudette 20:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; this article has no sources and is very speculative. Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 22:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete All rumors; speculative — Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 07:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * HEY LOOK AT THIS YOU IGNORANT LADIES!!!!!!!!Redguard101 01:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You do realise that is just another bunch of rumours, right? AlistairMcMillan 02:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Might I emphasize the name of the site as "macrumors.com"? The name itself indicates that anything here is not going to be verifiable. --Dennisthe2 17:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Same as whats been said above --JakeParker 02:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat 14:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.