Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Originals – Jack Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 02:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

ITunes Originals – Jack Johnson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this downloadable album. This was previously nominated for deletion in a bundle AFD that closed as no consensus: Articles for deletion/ITunes Originals (2nd nomination). Joe Chill (talk) 15:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of secondary sources; absolutely none exist. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 20:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: includes 3 charting songs. His other albums all have separate articles, so it would be a bit silly to shoehorn the tracklisting and other information for this one album into the discography section of the artist's article where the other albums are all nice neat clicky links (and it would be even sillier to exclude the information from Wikipedia altogether). Contains Mild Peril (talk) 18:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. No new recordings, no independent coverage, not notable. J04n(talk page) 05:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It does include new recordings, albeit mostly of previously released songs. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 17:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.