Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (August 2016)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTNEWS. No evidence that this event has any enduring notability and has received coverage beyond the routine "this will happen" announcement beforehand and "this is what happened" reports immediately afterwards. Fram (talk) 11:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Not-"NOTNEWS" here.  MPJ  -DK 14:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi article creator, any evidence for your claim? Fram (talk) 07:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the result of the IWRG Máscara vs. Máscara (September 2016) AfD, as well as the other three Lucha events that recent were brought to AfD but kept. I'm not sure how WP:NOTNEWS applies. Passes WP:SIGCOV requirements.LM2000 (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The September one had a lot more sources, and one that billed it as "the most important of its type for this company in the last few years". There is nothing comparable for this article, all we have is "it happened". All we have here is a database (cagematch), and one website bringing a report of the evening. Fails SIGCOV by a very wide margin. How would NOTNEWS not apply? See also WP:SUSTAINED. Fram (talk) 06:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I've dropped a neutral note at Village pump (policy) to get more input here. Fram (talk) 06:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.