Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am Bored


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was this is deleted. --Core desat 06:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I Am Bored

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does this really meet WP:WEB? As far as I can see, this article looks very much like an advert for the site, and its only claim of notability is a gold rating from TopTenREVIEWS, a website source which I am unsure meets the source criteria for WP:WEB itself. Delete, unless it can be demonstrated that this site meets WP:WEB. -- The Anome 12:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think it reads like an advert.  Useight 13:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I love the website, it's one of the first sites I visit every morning, but I'm not sure if it meets WP:WEB. Wildthing61476 14:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete popular and well-known, but can't find evidence that it's notable. Does indeed erad like an ad. JJL 14:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete advert, and even the Alexa rank trumpeted in the article is pretty unremarkable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Capmango 22:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a badly written spam article. —  Wen li  23:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 11:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The references in the article are limited in scope. Bored Entertainment Weekly? Had it been a general magazine like Time, it would be a different story. So it does not satisfy WP:WEB.--Kylohk 15:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak weak delete. The advertisement aspect calls for delete. The fact that someone did some decent work putting it together draws the 2 modifiers. --Stormbay 02:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.