Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am More Than My Hair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

I Am More Than My Hair

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Minor documentary style photography book that is currently cited from non-independent sources. My WP:BEFORE found databases and minor blogs e.g., this but I could not find anything indicating that WP:NBOOK, WP:GNG, or WP:NFILM are met. Update: thanks for the reference linked, though I personally would disagree that it would count towards notability as per my reply below, but if more sources are found do ping me. Thanks.  VickKiang  (talk)  05:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Film.  VickKiang   (talk)  05:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Appears to have a lot of false positives but this seems to be about the same thing? Jclemens (talk) 07:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reference. It looks to be the same thing IMO, though the reference mainly relies on quotes. Its bottom states that for more information see the full interview, and also links to For more information, click here for Alyscia Cunningham's website. I couldn't see independent in-depth direct coverage excluding quotes to result it to count as a full source towards WP:NBOOK or WP:NFILM or WP:GNG, but that is a good find. Many thanks.  VickKiang  (talk)  09:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. There's a review of the related documentary film here. pburka (talk) 18:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, unsure if it's a WP:RS, has a basic about us page but little editorial policies. The founder has a journalism degree so might be a subject-matter-expert, whereas some other contributors or photographers have little pertinent expertise, but the review seems to be WP:SIGCOV.  VickKiang  (talk)  20:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I can't find any sources, the ones given above are somewhat ok, but not enough for GNG I think. Oaktree b (talk) 15:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete not yet and may never be notable. Also promotional in that the bolded title is a direct link to buy the book on amazon. I agree with the nominator about the lack of notability. Lightburst (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.