Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Hate Myself


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (and surprised). Article needs to be gutted and stubbed. Marking it for cleanup. Keeper   76  20:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I Hate Myself

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An article with no non-trivial independent sources on a band whose members are all redlinked, which fails to explain the importance or significance of the subject, reads as personal opinion or essay. Guy (Help!) 21:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - When I saw the label as No Idea, I thought the writer was really, really dumb, until I clicked on it and it went to that record label's article. TALKIN   PIE EATER   REVIEW ME  22:49, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, they pass WP:MUSIC for their multiple releases on No Idea Records.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete In my opinion, No Idea cannot be deemed "one of the more important indie labels". LuciferMorgan (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep second party sourcing is needed to improve a very poorly written article full of hopeless OR. No idea has had notable artists release material. I recommend it be stubified to the basics. -- neon white talk 03:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added a couple of sources. Needs more clean-up. Axl (talk) 16:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.