Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Love Mountains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Appalachian Voices. Black Kite (talk) 14:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

I Love Mountains

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:N, WP:NOT - Notable? Appears to be self promotion and a link farm to other external sites. No valuable sources PeterWesco (talk) 15:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge It would be more relevant on the group's main page. Although, Appalachian Voices does seem to be a mess as well. ALH (talk) 07:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I think a merge of the NPOV data to Appalachian Voices "Efforts" would be okay, although there is already a reference.  With a hard decision made on the link farm and the POV section referred to as: "The site’s main educational features are:"  PeterWesco (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:04, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to a section on "opposition" in the Mountaintop removal mining article. There does not appear to be a lot of reliable sources on the campaign and the MRM article needs a section on opposition. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The Mountaintop removal mining has years of contentious notes and has constantly struggled to get to NPOV. Merging this website into an already (long) troubled article would only make things worse. Please refer to the two year old discussion: Talk:Mountaintop_removal_mining.  I have reconsidered my original AfD and think merge is the best way to go, but using the suggestion of ALH  PeterWesco (talk) 01:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JmaJeremy  ✆  ✎  05:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 16:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as having insufficient in-dpeth coverage in independent third party sources to meet WP:GNG. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.