Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Swear I Was There


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 13:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I Swear I Was There

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a book covering a Sex Pistols concert. Appears to have been created by the author of the book 10 years ago. No sources and very little content. The book doesn't appear to be covered in depth by reliable secondary sources; there is a BBC article, but it focuses on the Sex Pistols concert the book covers, rather than the book itself. Popcornduff (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 14:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources. The book is mentioned on both the author's page as well as for further reading under the Sex Pistols entry. This appears to be enough.--Jaldous1 (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: the book was published in 2006, but it's basically a print version of a television documentary made in 2001, also written and directed by David Nolan in his capacity as a regional TV producer. As such, the documentary is arguably more famous than the book, although it's debatable whether either of them merit a Wikipedia article. Richard3120 (talk) 00:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 11:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - significant independent coverage in reliable sources does not appear to exist. It's unlikely that there's enough that can be said about the book to warrant a discrete article anyway. ƒirefly  ( t · c · who? ) 11:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.