Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Want One of Those


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

I Want One of Those

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Coverage is shallow and awards minor. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree with the nominator --Ysangkok (talk) 18:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per:
 * Manning Gottlieb OMD wins I Want One of Those task | Campaign
 * I Want One Of Those to slash IT costs with Suse Linux platform | Retail Week
 * Imprint Magazine Review
 * Confetti and I Want One of Those change hands | Internet Retailing
 * Insider News North West – The Hut Group remains silent on Confetti administration
 * – Northamerica1000(talk) 21:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. These sources rather support my view that the coverage is shallow, e.g. they have bought a new computer, a review of their website and another firm has got their advertising account. It's not The Financial Times is it? Philafrenzy (talk) 22:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above were found from my initial source searches. Perhaps you should search for more, or just critique the ones that others provide instead? Northamerica1000(talk) 16:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 06:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.