Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Was a Teenage Zombie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. smooth0707 (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I Was a Teenage Zombie
Fails WP:MOVIE. No references. All red links = bad sign. I only saw this on imdb and RT. smooth0707 (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - review in the New York Times, for instance Wily D  14:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's in Leonard Maltin's movie guide and there's a review on TV Guide's website: SPNic (talk) 14:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - it seems notable enough within its niche as a cult film. The red links just seem to come with the territory as far as that goes; plenty of cult movies are made by largely unknown cast and crew. Fumoses (talk) 15:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I wouldn't call a New York Times review "no references". That satisfies a major lynchpin of notability. Can be improved, of course, but notability is established. 23skidoo (talk) 19:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The Times review was just added, in reference to your snide insinuation. smooth0707  (talk) 19:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 23:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That review isn't from the NYT, it's just a mirror of the review at Allmovie, and it's not enough to indicate notability by itself. That said, I'm satisfied by the reviews listed at Rotten Tomatoes, so Keep. PC78 (talk) 23:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I Was a Teenage Zombie frequently appears on cable televison - within the last year I have seen it on either Sundance or IFC. Also reviewed at Rotten Tomatoes and Yahoo! Movies. ExRat (talk) 01:37, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * SNOW Keep per notability well established. Why did this even come to AfD?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This should never have been AfD, a clearly notable film. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 08:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.