Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I a Woman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

I a Woman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable film  Oddbodz   - (  Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 13:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: Film was briefly reviewed by The New York Times here. I suspect that additional sources may not be readily available online. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 13:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as a notable film. In addition to The New York Times above, Roger Ebert has reviewed the film as seen here. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 14:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * There is also a review by TV Guide here. It should also be noted that one should search for "I, A Woman" as opposed to "I A Woman" for better results. There are more relevant results in Google Books searching for the title with the comma included. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 14:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


 * We need not depend on only English sources, as this non-English / non-American film had multiple international releases, as well as multiple re-releases in Denmark itself:
 * Original Danish:
 * Brazil:
 * Finland 1:
 * Finland 2:
 * France:
 * Greece:
 * Italy:
 * Mexico:
 * Netherlands:
 * Norway:
 * Sweden:
 * USA:
 * West Germany:
 * Yugoslavia:


 * STRONG Keep (possible speedy keep) Sorry, but sending a brand new stub article to AFD only 21 minutes after it was contributed seems to be show a lack of due diligence... and AFD is not for forcing others to improve the improvable. I'll continue work, but others are most welcome to join.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


 * UPDATE: the 17 word stub that was (IMHO) prematurely sent to AFD, is now a 626 word C-Class article that informs our readers... an easy 36x expansion. I would ask that consider a withdrawal so we can close this and move on. Now to think up another DYK. .  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Original poster here
 * Schmidt above has pulled together a lot of new information (well, new to me) about the film and done lots of stuff with templates (or whatever they're called). The film's page is now thoroughly up to the standards of most film articles and the "Deletion" flag should be lifted.
 * Re OddBodz belief that it was not a notable film - since it came to my attention while watching a TV documentary titled "Sex and the Silver Screen", which spent about 5 of 55 minutes on the film, I don't think Oddbodz's opinion is universally shared.
 * I was very surprised that a film of such prominence did not have a Wikipedia page. Aidan Karley (talk) 10:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Appreciations, . There are lots of topics that do not (yet) have Wikipedia entries... but then it is self-admittedly an unfinished work in progress. Unless the nominator chooses to withdraw, or unless it is so obvious that the topic will not be deleted and the discussion then closed by an uninvolved editor per WP:SNOW and WP:OUTCOMES, an AFD discussion usually runs for 7 days. If your comment is intended (likely) as a "keep", you can simply head it with that word emboldened. Cheers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Note to closer: After the expected keep, this article should be moved to the more properly sourcable I, A Woman per WP:NCF and WP:ENGLISH. Thanks,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, doesn't the "A" need to be lowercase "a"? Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 13:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, to be fair, I, a woman would be best (see English film poster). But as we're Anglifying a non-English title, I felt this would look most proper per WP:NCF and WP:ENGLISH. Of course, the original Jeg - en kvinde is far more searchable than the English. I just wished to have whatever here be most searchable and with fewer false positives that the current title. We DO need that coma though.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly notable. Well done on the expansion, ! 97198 (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Along with the sources found by Schmidt above, I also found multiple mentions in books like this one and this one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Per sources found by  and .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I did a search on Newspapers.com and there are thousands of hits. Apparently this was quite a controversial film in the US  I am One of Many (talk) 21:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.