Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I am unused


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  03:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

I am unused

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable web-series. Did not receive any reviews from major publications. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG  Jupitus Smart  02:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India.  Jupitus Smart  02:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Various reviews exist, for example here, or here at least. MY, OH MY! (mushy yank)  08:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you able to find any reviews that meet WP:ICTFSOURCES &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * We generally do not accept reviews from random blog pages. A list of publications considered reliable according to our standards are mentioned by an editor above.  Jupitus Smart  13:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Also refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Maheshworld which concerns this. Socking by a probable paid syndicate.  Jupitus Smart  15:14, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nomination, only 2 reliable sources listed per WP:ICTFSOURCES with no reviews. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 11:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

— the Main Logan  (t•c) 03:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. These might be personal nitpicks, but I feel like they prove that nobody knows anything about this show:
 * This is an article about a television series... using the film template. Already a bad start.
 * The article title isn't even capitalized correctly! In fact, title capitalization is extremely inconsistent through the article.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.