Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Axton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Ian Axton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local TV news broadcaster with hardly any RS, just profile pages. Although well known in the west country, he's probably notable anywhere else. If more RS can be found, article has scope to remain.  - Funky Snack  ( Talk ) 12:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Broadcasters do not get an automatic Wikipedia inclusion freebie just because their own staff profiles on the self-published websites of their own employers verify that they exist — the notability test is the reception of substantive reliable source coverage in media outlets that don't sign his paycheque. The awards might be valid notability claims if they could be properly referenced as notable awards that get media coverage, but are still not instant "inherent notability" passes that would exempt him from actually having to have any reliable source coverage. Bearcat (talk) 17:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NBIO due to lack of WP:RS.  -- RoySmith (talk) 14:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.