Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Brannan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Ian Brannan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No inherent notability for a radio broadcaster; no reliable sources are given in the article and a Google News search turned up nothing at all. The webz only show resume-type information, nothing remotely reliable. The claimed nomination/awards (and participation in projects that got nominated/awarded) are unverified and hardly notable in the first place. Drmies (talk) 14:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: The Sony Radio Academy Awards are, according to their article, "some of the most prestigious awards in the British radio industry" so the awards are notable but merely being nominated (as is true of the subject here) does not carry the same weight as winning the award. - Dravecky (talk) 09:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find any reliable sources to establish notability per WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:34, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 5 August 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete There just aren't independent sources about Mr. Brannan, let alone reliable or in-depth ones to support a Wikipedia article. Exeva (talk) 02:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.