Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Coldwater


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Ian Coldwater

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Failure to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines; insufficient independent & secondary sources; article reads like a CV (see: what Wikipedia is not) WikiEditor93B (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Minnesota. Shellwood (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It's on the edge, but I think the coverage in Reuters, the multiple mentions in an O'Reilly book on Kubernetes, and the several references to Coldwater as an influential Kubernetes and computer security community member put this into keep territory. I've cleaned up the cites a bit and swapped out some independent ones. I disagree that it reads like a CV, though even if it did that is a surmountable problem. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment One mention in a hacker book, but it looks like an interview they did with this person. Not really much else found for sources, was a panelist at an EFF talk recently on LGBTQ issues, and the pronoun used is "They" as well. I can't find any coverage of the event itself. Oaktree b (talk) 02:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The subject is not notable and the article should not stay because the guidelines have not been met. The interview does not help .IrishOsita (talk) 02:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.