Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Dennis (designer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Ian Dennis (designer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's a relatively common name, so researching is a tad difficult, but I can't find any in-depth sourcing on a designer by this name. Was deprodded without improvement with the rationale, "I believe good references have been added which support the page". So here we are.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment It's a shame that there isn't very much material to work with. I'm not familiar enough with Ian Dennis other work to decide if we should have an article about him. The only claim to notability is the NT logo, it seems. The source is actually an excerpt from a book . I suppose it could be merged into an article about FHK Henrion (but that would have to focus on the firm, not the person). There's another version of the story here. Additionally, there is the issue with some of the unsourced material, which doesn't appear to be source-able and makes me think that the author, may have access to unpublished knowledge and is perhaps associated with Indent Design, as the user name implies. Mduvekot (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete significance unclear beyond NT logo. Perhaps NT logo deserves an article (as the 10th best logo per one source). I wasn't able to find any significant sources.Icewhiz (talk) 06:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete It seems that the only significant work of note is one logo. To my mind, this is not enough to establish criteria for an article on the designer. Seems self-promotional as described above. Netherzone (talk) 23:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.