Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Keaggy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hot Chelle Rae. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Ian Keaggy
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. The article has two references. The first, a one-paragraph article from 2013, is not significant coverage. The other is his management company so is not independent of the subject. I was able to find an AllMusic entry, but it contains no write-up, while this and this are also not significant coverage. This is interesting, but half the article is spent on his former band. There may be some additional print media, but I couldn't find it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Walter Görlitz. I got notified about this article since I created a redirect in 2012. But it looks like Iankeaggy is the real author. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hot Chelle Rae as previously stood. Additionally (the creator) seems to have a COI of some sort. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I notified that editor of the potential CoI. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect If his previous band is considered notable, then a redirect would seem to be the obvious outcome. Agree with nom., unable to find enough coverage for a standalone page. Eagleash (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect - restore to redirect. Not enough in-depth coverage to establish standalone notability. Onel 5969  TT me 13:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable on his own.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.