Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Mugoya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Ian Mugoya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a media personality and businessman, which just states that he exists and contains no actual claim as to why his existence is encyclopedic. Of the sources being cited, one is a blurb about how good he looks in one of his clothing company's own suits, which reads far more like a fashion blog entry than an actual news story, and the other is just a photograph of him graduating from school -- so neither of them contribute to building a WP:GNG claim, because even the one that has some actual content doesn't have substantive content. As always, neither businesspeople nor television personalities get an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist; reliable sourcing, supporting a proper claim of notability, must be present for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 19:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't pass GNG and even a Google search doesn't yield much to establish notability of the subject. Tushi  Talk To Me  17:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.