Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Nottingham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Witchblade. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 03:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Ian Nottingham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A character with insufficient third person sources to justify having an article. Unless someone can provide sufficient third person information to justify this article I suggest deletion or merger is the only solution. Dwanyewest (talk) 22:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 03:46, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge to Witchblade. That target already has a paragraph on him, which seems sufficient. Nothing to suggest the character is notable enough for its own article. Boleyn (talk) 08:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect to Witchblade. (The article doesn't have a subsection on Ian Nottingham, so Witchblade will just redirect it to the top of the article anyway.) Given that Ian Nottingham is mentioned in the Witchblade article's very terse plot summary and is one of about a dozen characters listed in the "Characters" section, it would seem he's significant enough to the series to merit a redirect there. I haven't read the series, though, so it could be that straight-up deletion would be more appropriate. At any rate, there's nothing in his article to suggest that he's notable enough for his own article, nor anything worth merging to Witchblade.--NukeofEarl (talk) 16:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Witchblade per Boleyn.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.