Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Ritchie (baseball)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. RL0919 (talk) 19:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Ian Ritchie (baseball)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Minor league prospect, fails WP:NBASE. Can possibly be redirected to the Braves prospect page. SportingFlyer  T · C  16:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  16:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Washington. Shellwood (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. NBASE no longer exists; all that matters is whether the player passes the general notability guideline. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh. Yow. That's going to lead to some bad outcomes with potentially trivial prospects like these. SportingFlyer  T · C  17:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I didn't know of that NBASE being depreciated as well. It likely doesn't help that many of these players were created under that old guideline. Oaktree b (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Seems to be enough coverage in the Seattle Times, the MLB.com coverage is not terribly in depth or routine, but it helps. Oaktree b (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak keep As the creator of the article, I do believe that the subject passes GNG although just barely. A merge into Atlanta Braves minor league players would be a good alternative to deletion if it is decided that the subject isn't notable. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG with coverage primarially from Seattle Times along with profiles/coverage from smaller publications. Any MLB.com coverage is non-independent and would not apply to GNG, but it is not needed in this case.  Frank   Anchor  15:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.