Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibaby-muller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 11:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Ibaby-muller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no indication that this product is notable. The only reference is the company's own product description. Gronk Oz (talk) 09:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as there obviously seems to be not good coverage and my searches found nothing better than a Chinese press release. SwisterTwister   talk  21:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: blatant business promotion, IMO. Quis separabit?  23:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - This looks like an open-and-shut case to me. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.