Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibanez RG Tremolo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ibanez RG.  Sandstein  06:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Ibanez RG Tremolo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of article is a distinction that is not particularly useful or in current use. There is already an Ibanez RG article into which the content of this page (should anyone find it useful) could be merged. It does not appear that there is any editor who has maintained this article, leaving it with a level of detail on one particular period that has not been maintained. The amount of effort required to bring this article up to the level of detail of parts of it would be fairly immense. Finally, I'm not convinced that an article with such detail is necessary or useful in the scope of the overall encyclopedia. This is a subject that might be (and is) better covered in a different resource. &mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 22:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Ibanez RG. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.