Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iberia Airlines Flight 933


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Iberia Airlines Flight 933

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:GNG WP:NOTNEWS Non-notable accident with no fatalities and no consequences, no notable passengers or other notable attribute Petebutt (talk) 06:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 07:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 07:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 07:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 07:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep it's a B-class article with good coverage and good sourcing, I can't find anywhere that people have to die for an incident to become notable, and most people who do die in notable events are non-notable people. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 09:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article not remotely B-class -- it's rated Start, and the checklist for whether it meets B status or not has "criteria not met" for referencing and citation, coverage and accuracy, and grammar and style. Far from having "good coverage" or "good sourcing," the article's devoid of news sources, and is referenced by the likes of blogs, Flickr and fan sites like planespotters.net and taxiways.de.  Indeed, an event need not have fatalities to be notable ... but it does need to meet the GNG.   Ravenswing   12:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. First hull loss of a DC-10. Hull loss instances for major passenger aircraft are typically notable, especially since the plane was carrying passengers when it crashed! Also made front-page news in random local newspapers the day after or third-page national news in random local papers, though was buried in the NY Times  Furthermore the FAA itself established the incident led to a better understanding of wind shear.  SportingFlyer (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. major hull loss, coverage is indebth. Yes the article could and probably should be expanded but so far it seems pretty notable to me. The two above keep !votes also bring up some good arguments for retention in my opinion. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable as the first DC-10 hull loss. Any issues that the article has are not a reason to delete it. Mjroots (talk) 08:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.